DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0329612
Mendelian randomization analysis: The causal relationship between C-reactive protein and amyloidosis and between C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A number of studies have shown that elevated CRP is linked to AS and reduced CRP is linked to amyloidosis. However, the exact mechanism explaining this connection is not known.
METHODS
We used genomic pooled data from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) in a two-sample, two-way Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis study. Methods used included inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median (WM), MR-Egger method, Cochran's Q, MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. To investigate the specific causal relationship between C-reactive protein and amyloidosis and between C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis (coronary, cerebral, aortic, and peripheral atherosclerosis). The study procedure was performed with the STROBE-MR checklist.
RESULTS
There was a inverse association between C-reactive protein and amyloidosis and an positive causal relationship between C-reactive protein and aortic atherosclerosis. The development of aortic atherosclerosis was positively correlated with C-reactive protein levels (IVW:p = 0.003, OR=1.203,95% CI:1.066-1.358). Whereas amyloidosis onset was associated with reduced C-reactive protein levels (IVW:p = 0.022, OR=0.582,95% CI:0.366-0.924). Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis found no evidence of reverse causality.
CONCLUSION
We verified the existence of a negative association between C-reactive protein and amyloidosis and a positive association between C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis by Mendelian randomization, which may provide some reference value for subsequent studies and treatment in the clinic.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.