Dextrose-containing fluids causing false-positive serum galactomannan: a case-control study and interrupted time series analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to identify the cause of false-positive serum Aspergillus antigen galactomannan (GM) results in our centre.
METHODS
We performed a case-control study aiming to elucidate the factors associated with false-positive GM results. Independent risk factors for false-positive GM were evaluated through a multivariable regression analysis. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention removing the identified factors.
RESULTS
Among 568 patients tested, GM was positive in 130 patients of whom 97 had false-positive GM (cases). These were compared with 427 patients with true-negative GM (controls). Administration of dextrose-containing fluids within 6 days before GM testing was an independent predictor for false-positive GM results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 18.60; 95% CI, 8.95-38.66. An analysis of GM presence in different dextrose-containing fluids revealed positivity in 34.8% (8 of 23) (manufacturer A) and 33.3% (5 of 15) (manufacturer B) of the samples. Investigation of the manufacturing process revealed that the saccharification process employed enzymes derived from Aspergillus niger. After identifying the root cause of false positivity, GM-containing dextrose fluid use was restricted. Interrupted time series analysis showed an immediate reduction of GM false-positivity (-6.5% per week, p = 0.045) and a declining trend (-0.33% per week, p = 0.005) postintervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Administering dextrose-containing fluids was the primary factor causing false-positive serum Aspergillus antigen GM assay results. Our investigation led to a modification of the manufacturing process of the dextrose-containing fluids.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.