International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2016
Interleukin-4 enzyme-linked immunospot assay may be useful for diagnosing sensitization to house dust mite.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Dong-Yeop, Lee Jino, Choi Sung-Won, Lee Hyeong Joo, Kang Hyunmo, Yeo Seong Chul, Joo Yeon-Hee, Cho Hyun-Jin, Jeon Sea-Yuong, Kim Rock Bum, Kim Sang-Wook
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The skin prick test (SPT) is considered a standard test for identification of allergens, but it has some limitations in clinical practice. The multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which measures allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in patients' serum, is a widely used alternative test, but is limited by its relatively low sensitivity and specificity. As a novel diagnostic test to identify allergens, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of an interleukin-4 (IL-4) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay for Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p).
METHODS: Based on the symptoms and SPT results, 43 house dust mite (HDM) allergic rhinitis (AR) patients and 41 control subjects were included. Peripheral blood was drawn from each subject for IL-4 ELISpot assay and MAST. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the cutoff values. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and neg predictive values were compared between the 2 tests.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the IL-4 ELISpot assay were 88.4%, 97.6%, and 0.939 for Der f, and 95.3%, 97.5%, and 0.971 for Der p, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of MAST were 76.7%, 73.2%, and 0.777 for Der f, and 69.8%, 75.6%, and 0.788 for Der p, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The IL-4 ELISpot assay showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than MAST, which indicates its clinical feasibility for diagnosing allergy for HDM. A further study is needed to determine the accuracy of the IL-4 ELISpot assay for other common allergens.
METHODS: Based on the symptoms and SPT results, 43 house dust mite (HDM) allergic rhinitis (AR) patients and 41 control subjects were included. Peripheral blood was drawn from each subject for IL-4 ELISpot assay and MAST. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the cutoff values. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and neg predictive values were compared between the 2 tests.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the IL-4 ELISpot assay were 88.4%, 97.6%, and 0.939 for Der f, and 95.3%, 97.5%, and 0.971 for Der p, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of MAST were 76.7%, 73.2%, and 0.777 for Der f, and 69.8%, 75.6%, and 0.788 for Der p, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The IL-4 ELISpot assay showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than MAST, which indicates its clinical feasibility for diagnosing allergy for HDM. A further study is needed to determine the accuracy of the IL-4 ELISpot assay for other common allergens.