Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering · 2026
Perspectives on biomechanical data: a cross-disciplinary survey of current practices, challenges, and future needs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Borsch Jonas, Schnur David, Roth Sebastian, Hartmann Ulrich, Friemert Daniel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the current usage, challenges, and specific needs regarding biomechanical data, with a focus on gait analysis, across a diverse field such as sports performance, clinical rehabilitation, and occupational health.
METHODS: We conducted a survey among more than 300 institutions in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). Of 49 individuals who began the survey, 24 submitted complete responses.
RESULTS: Findings indicate that participants recognize the value of biomechanical data, yet adoption of publicly available datasets is hindered by inconsistent formats, limited metadata, and strict privacy regulations. Respondents emphasized standardized documentation and clearer guidelines to facilitate sharing and collaboration. Many institutions are overwhelmed by legal compliance, with data proception laws posing significant hurdles to effective usage.
CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the need to (1) establish standardized file formats, (2) improve metadata quality, (3) develop transparent, consistent data-sharing protocols, and (4) clarify legal frameworks for compliance.
METHODS: We conducted a survey among more than 300 institutions in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). Of 49 individuals who began the survey, 24 submitted complete responses.
RESULTS: Findings indicate that participants recognize the value of biomechanical data, yet adoption of publicly available datasets is hindered by inconsistent formats, limited metadata, and strict privacy regulations. Respondents emphasized standardized documentation and clearer guidelines to facilitate sharing and collaboration. Many institutions are overwhelmed by legal compliance, with data proception laws posing significant hurdles to effective usage.
CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the need to (1) establish standardized file formats, (2) improve metadata quality, (3) develop transparent, consistent data-sharing protocols, and (4) clarify legal frameworks for compliance.