DOI 10.1007/s00330-022-09262-9
Impaired median nerve mobility in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the mobility of the median nerve (MN) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients compared to healthy people.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed and the electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2022. All published observational studies comparing the excursion of MN between participants with and without CTS were included. The quality of research was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. The primary outcome was the excursion of the MN under dynamic examination, representing nerve mobility quantified by the standardized mean difference (SMD) for random effect meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative review, and twelve entered the meta-analysis involving a total of 375 CTS patients and 296 healthy controls. The forest plot revealed that the mobility of the MN significantly decreased in the CTS group compared to the non-CTS control (SMD = -1.47, 95% CI: -1.91, -1.03, p < 0.001, heterogeneity 82%). In subgroup analysis, both transverse and longitudinal methods for nerve excursion showed less nerve mobility in CTS than in non-CTS.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed that the patients with CTS exhibited less mobility of the MN than those without CTS, suggesting MN mobility as a potential CTS marker.
KEY POINTS: • The patients with CTS revealed less mobility of the median nerve than those without CTS. • The mobility of the median nerve could be regarded as a potential CTS marker.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.