Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2007
Prospective peer-review audit of paediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Loughlin Edward V, Dutt Shoma, Kamath Ramananda, Gaskin Kevin, Dorney Stuart
Аннотация
AIM: To describe the findings of paediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and to reduce the rate of normal findings in children undergoing diagnostic UGE.
METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed at a single tertiary referral children's hospital over a 3-year period by four endoscopists. Patients were subgrouped into diagnostic categories (recurrent abdominal pain syndrome (RAP), oesophagitis, coeliac disease and enteropathy/inflammatory bowel disease) and endoscopists recorded their clinical diagnosis as above before each procedure. Endoscopic and biopsy findings were compared with clinical diagnosis. After the first year of audit each endoscopist was appraised of their practice and strategies implemented to reduce the normal UGE. In years 2 and 3 all endoscopists were audited by their peers on a monthly basis.
RESULTS: A total of 1172 UGE were performed over a 3-year period. Ninety per cent were diagnostic procedures, of which 48% were normal, 16% identified oesophagitis, 11% coeliac disease, 6% gastritis, 3%Helicobacter pylori and 1% peptic ulcer disease. Peer-review audit significantly reduced the number of normal findings in coeliac disease, RAP and overall (P < 0.01) but not in the groups with presumed oesophagitis or investigation of enteropathy/inflammatory bowel disease.
CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients undergoing UGE have normal procedures. Peer-review audit can reduce the number of normal procedures particularly in RAP and in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.
METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed at a single tertiary referral children's hospital over a 3-year period by four endoscopists. Patients were subgrouped into diagnostic categories (recurrent abdominal pain syndrome (RAP), oesophagitis, coeliac disease and enteropathy/inflammatory bowel disease) and endoscopists recorded their clinical diagnosis as above before each procedure. Endoscopic and biopsy findings were compared with clinical diagnosis. After the first year of audit each endoscopist was appraised of their practice and strategies implemented to reduce the normal UGE. In years 2 and 3 all endoscopists were audited by their peers on a monthly basis.
RESULTS: A total of 1172 UGE were performed over a 3-year period. Ninety per cent were diagnostic procedures, of which 48% were normal, 16% identified oesophagitis, 11% coeliac disease, 6% gastritis, 3%Helicobacter pylori and 1% peptic ulcer disease. Peer-review audit significantly reduced the number of normal findings in coeliac disease, RAP and overall (P < 0.01) but not in the groups with presumed oesophagitis or investigation of enteropathy/inflammatory bowel disease.
CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients undergoing UGE have normal procedures. Peer-review audit can reduce the number of normal procedures particularly in RAP and in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.