MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sle.0000000000000419

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2017

Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer of the Splenic Flexure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Martínez-Pérez Aleix, Brunetti Francesco, Vitali Giulio C, Abdalla Solafah, Ris Frédéric, de'Angelis Nicola

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis on the surgical treatments of splenic flexure carcinomas (SFCs). Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from January 1990 to May 2016. Studies of at least 5 patients comparing extended right colectomy (ERC) versus left colectomy (LC) and/or laparoscopy versus open surgery for SFCs were retrieved and analyzed. Overall, 12 retrospective studies were selected, including 569 patients. ERC was performed in 23.2% of patients, whereas LC in 76.8%. Pooled data suggested that ERC and LC had similar oncologic quality of resection and postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopy was used in 50.6% of patients (conversion rate: 2.5%) and it was associated with significantly shorter time to oral diet, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay than open surgery. In conclusion, the optimal extent of SFC surgical resection, that is, ERC or LC remains under debate. However, laparoscopy provides better postoperative outcomes and fewer postoperative complications than open surgery.

Для цитирования: Martínez-Pérez Aleix, Brunetti Francesco, Vitali Giulio C, Abdalla Solafah, Ris Frédéric, de'Angelis Nicola. Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer of the Splenic Flexure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000419.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.