International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Orlandi Richard R, Kingdom Todd T, Hwang Peter H, Smith Timothy L, Alt Jeremiah A, Baroody Fuad M, Batra Pete S, Bernal-Sprekelsen Manuel, Bhattacharyya Neil, Chandra Rakesh K, Chiu Alexander, Citardi Martin J, Cohen Noam A, DelGaudio John, Desrosiers Martin, Dhong Hun-Jong, Douglas Richard, Ferguson Berrylin, Fokkens Wytske J, Georgalas Christos, Goldberg Andrew, Gosepath Jan, Hamilos Daniel L, Han Joseph K, Harvey Richard, Hellings Peter, Hopkins Claire, Jankowski Roger, Javer Amin R, Kern Robert, Kountakis Stilianos, Kowalski Marek L, Lane Andrew, Lanza Donald C, Lebowitz Richard, Lee Heung-Man, Lin Sandra Y, Lund Valerie, Luong Amber, Mann Wolf, Marple Bradley F, McMains Kevin C, Metson Ralph, Naclerio Robert, Nayak Jayakar V, Otori Nobuyoshi, Palmer James N, Parikh Sanjay R, Passali Desiderio, Peters Anju, Piccirillo Jay, Poetker David M, Psaltis Alkis J, Ramadan Hassan H, Ramakrishnan Vijay R, Riechelmann Herbert, Roh Hwan-Jung, Rudmik Luke, Sacks Raymond, Schlosser Rodney J, Senior Brent A, Sindwani Raj, Stankiewicz James A, Stewart Michael, Tan Bruce K, Toskala Elina, Voegels Richard, Wang De Yun, Weitzel Erik K, Wise Sarah, Woodworth Bradford A, Wormald Peter-John, Wright Erin D, Zhou Bing, Kennedy David W
Аннотация
METHODS: Evidence-based reviews with recommendations(EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR)was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus.
RESULTS: The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS)with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AECRS), and pediatric RS.
CONCLUSION: As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too often the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lower level evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed.