DOI 10.1186/s40246-025-00749-2
Reliability of clinical impressions and optimal genetic diagnostic strategies of heritable connective tissue disorders with ocular involvement in a large Chinese cohort.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the reliability of clinical impressions based on ocular manifestations in patients suspected of heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTDs) compared to the final genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, it sought to determine the optimal diagnostic strategy for patients with HCTDs through pathogenicity analysis.
METHODS
Clinical characteristics of 58 patients suspected of HCTDs were analyzed to establish provisional clinical diagnoses. Subsequently, next-generation sequence and Sanger sequence was performed to obtain genetic diagnoses. Pathogenicity of identified variants was assessed through conservation analysis and the functional impact, which was predicted using three-dimensional protein structure modeling.
RESULTS
The provisional clinical diagnosis was concordant with the molecular diagnostic result in only 21 patients. Independent of the initial clinical impression, a probable genetic diagnosis was achieved for all 58 patients following comprehensive re-analysis of next-generation sequence data, combined with pathogenicity assessment using three-dimensional protein structure and conservation analysis of suspicious positive variants.
CONCLUSION
This study broadens the mutational spectrum of HCTDs with 31 novel variants. By employing innovative methodologies to delineate phenotype-genotype relationships, including the detection of potentially pathogenic variants, this work may inform future diagnostic strategies and guide comprehensive disease and organ system monitoring. Ongoing refinement and vigilant clinical oversight remain essential for patients and their families.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.