Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2025
Prevalence of Skeletal Anteroposterior Malocclusions in Skeletally Mature Patients in Puerto Rico: A Pilot Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rivera Laura, Elías-Boneta Augusto R, García Rodríguez Omar, Buxó-Martinez Carmen J, Oliva Jazmin, Rivas-Tumanyan Sona
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of skeletal anteroposterior malocclusions and their associated components in orthodontic patients living in Puerto Rico.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 normodivergent patients (cervical vertebral maturation stages 4-6) from the Orthodontic Graduate Program (2012-2014) of the University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus. A calibrated examiner obtained five measurements (Frankfort Horizontal-Sella-Nasion, Sella-Nasion-Gonion-Gnathion, Sella-Nasion-A point, Sella-Nasion-B point, and A point-Nasion-B point) from patients' initial cephalometric x-rays using Dolphin Imaging software, version 11.7, to determine the presence and distribution of skeletal jaw discrepancies. Sex-based differences were explored using the Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The prevalence of skeletal discrepancies was 78%. The most common skeletal malocclusion was Class II (54%), followed by Class I (34%) and Class III (12%). Class II malocclusions were associated with maxillary prognathism (59%), whereas Class III malocclusions were attributed to mandibular prognathism (83%). Most Class I patients did not present a discrepancy (65%); however, we observed bimaxillary prognathism in 24% of Class I patients, and a low position of Sella was detected in 54% of the sample. No significant sex-based differences were observed in the five cephalometric x-ray measurements (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: A high percentage of patients presented with a skeletal malocclusion. Class II skeletal malocclusions due to maxillary prognathism predominated; no sex-based differences were found for skeletal jaw discrepancies; a low Sella position was frequently observed.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 normodivergent patients (cervical vertebral maturation stages 4-6) from the Orthodontic Graduate Program (2012-2014) of the University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus. A calibrated examiner obtained five measurements (Frankfort Horizontal-Sella-Nasion, Sella-Nasion-Gonion-Gnathion, Sella-Nasion-A point, Sella-Nasion-B point, and A point-Nasion-B point) from patients' initial cephalometric x-rays using Dolphin Imaging software, version 11.7, to determine the presence and distribution of skeletal jaw discrepancies. Sex-based differences were explored using the Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The prevalence of skeletal discrepancies was 78%. The most common skeletal malocclusion was Class II (54%), followed by Class I (34%) and Class III (12%). Class II malocclusions were associated with maxillary prognathism (59%), whereas Class III malocclusions were attributed to mandibular prognathism (83%). Most Class I patients did not present a discrepancy (65%); however, we observed bimaxillary prognathism in 24% of Class I patients, and a low position of Sella was detected in 54% of the sample. No significant sex-based differences were observed in the five cephalometric x-ray measurements (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: A high percentage of patients presented with a skeletal malocclusion. Class II skeletal malocclusions due to maxillary prognathism predominated; no sex-based differences were found for skeletal jaw discrepancies; a low Sella position was frequently observed.