MRI features of sinonasal tract angiofibroma/juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Case series and systematic review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To comprehensively summarize the radiological characteristics of sinonasal tract angiofibroma (STA) (commonly known as juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma).
METHODS
Forty-four lesions from 41 cases provided by 33 study articles identified through a systematic review and 13 lesions from 13 cases from our institution associated with patients with STA who underwent MRI were included in the review study, carried out by two board-certified experienced radiologists.
RESULTS
The study participants were all male patients with a mean age of 15.6 years at the time of diagnosis. All of them presented with nasal cavity lesions (100%), predominantly in the nasopharynx (98.2%). The sphenopalatine foramen/pterygopalatine fossa was involved in 76.0%, and compressive shift of the posterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus was present in more than half (57.9%). T2-weighted imaging signal intensity was heterogeneous with mixed high and iso intensities as compared to skeletal muscle (100%). T1-weighted imaging showed partial high signal intensity in 61.1% of the cases. Flow void and intense enhancement were present in almost all cases. Cystic/nonenhancement changes on contrast-enhanced MRI were relatively common (40.8%). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (2.07 × 10-3 mm2 /second) and some quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters were high. There was a significant difference in the frequency of residual/recurrent lesions based on the presence of MRI findings of skull base invasion (p = .017) and intracranial extension (p = .003).
CONCLUSIONS
We summarized the MRI findings of STA that can facilitate timely diagnosis and appropriate management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.