MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica · 2016

[Diagnosis of Feeding and Eating Disorders Using DSM-5 -Checkpoints on Making a Diagnosis-].

Nakai Yoshikatsu, Nin Kazuko

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We reviewed the diagnostic checkpoints associated with the diagnosis of feeding and eat- ing disorders (FED) using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) - 5, focusing on two new categories : avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and binge-eating disorder (BED). There are some differences between the diagnostic checkpoints for FED employed in Japan and Western countries. In Japan, some patients with anorexia ner- vosa (AN) -like conditions do not exhibit any evidence of fat phobia or a distorted view of their body weight and shape. Accordingly, we need to differentiate these patients from those with AN or ARFID. Since Japanese BED patients do not have high body mass indices compared with those in Western countries, it is not easy to differentiate BED from non-purging bulimia nervosa in Japan. We observed a 30% reduction in the diagnostic frequency of other specified FED/unspecified FED after the implementation of DSM-5 compared with the diagnostic fre- quency of eating disorder not otherwise specified based on DSM-IV. These findings suggest that DSM-5 is useful for diagnosing FED, but there are various checkpoints that we need to consider when diagnosing FED using DSM-5.

Для цитирования: Nakai Yoshikatsu, Nin Kazuko. [Diagnosis of Feeding and Eating Disorders Using DSM-5 -Checkpoints on Making a Diagnosis-].. Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.