MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.36849/jdd.5751

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD · 2021

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Dinoprostone Following Dermabrasion in Stable Vitiligo.

Kaur Jaskirat, Kumar Sumir, Brar B K, Boparai Amarbir Singh

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Dinoprostone (DNP), a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) analogue, has been found to cause repigmenation in vitiliginous lesions. Combined medical and surgical therapy might be more useful for successful treatment of vitiligo.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dermabrasion followed by dinoprostone gel and to compare it with tacrolimus ointment following the same procedure in the treatment of localized stable vitiligo.

METHODS

40 patients of stable vitiligo were enrolled which were divided in two groups of 20 patients each. In group 1, dermabrasion followed by tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was done and in group 2, dermabrasion followed by dinoprostone gel was done.

RESULTS

Group 1 patients showed slightly better response (P=0.039), whereas the side effect profile was better for group 2.

CONCLUSION

DNP and tacrolimus have immunomodulatory and melanocyte stimulating effect and are well tolerated when combined with dermabrasion. Their effect on skin pigmentation could be enhanced by dermabrasion. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(5):519-522. doi:10.36849/JDD.5751.

Для цитирования: Kaur Jaskirat, Kumar Sumir, Brar B K, Boparai Amarbir Singh. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Dinoprostone Following Dermabrasion in Stable Vitiligo.. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 2021. DOI: 10.36849/jdd.5751.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.