Distinct phenotypic clusters of sleep-disordered breathing and their association with medical care-seeking behaviour and sleep habits: the Guangdong Sleep Health Study.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent, but its rates of diagnosis and treatment are low. As a heterogeneous condition, it is associated with delayed diagnosis and/or suboptimal treatment. We aimed to determine distinct SDB clusters and examine their association with medical care-seeking behaviour and sleep habits in a community-dwelling population in South China. Participants were enrolled in the 'Guangdong Sleep Health Study'. Five distinct community sites were investigated. Participant information was collected, and overnight sleep monitoring was performed. Latent class analysis was performed to classify patients with SDB based on patterns of SDB-related symptoms and signs. Overall, 1,524 patients with SDB were evaluated. Four distinct clusters were identified: 'minimally symptomatic' (Cluster 2), which was the most dominant subtype (41.6%), followed by 'pure insomnia/fewer daytime symptoms' (Cluster 4; 24.7%), 'insomnia/multiple daytime symptoms' (Cluster 3; 17.8%), and 'upper airway symptoms with sleepiness' (Cluster 1; 15.9%). The overall medical care-seeking rate attributable to sleep and breathing disorders was only 3.3%: 10.3% in Cluster 3, 2.5% in Cluster 1, 2.1% in Cluster 4, and 1.3% in Cluster 2, in which Cluster 3 was the highest and Cluster 2 was the lowest (adjusted p < 0.05). Regarding the sleep habit of going to bed and waking up at a consistent time, Cluster 3 exhibited the worst performance and Cluster 2 the best. In conclusion, distinct phenotypic subtypes were identified in community-dwelling patients with SDB. Tailored strategies to encourage medical care-seeking, early identification, and optimisation of treatment are necessary considering the different subtypes.