MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27255

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2022

Survival outcomes for patients with T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis treated with definitive radiation alone versus chemoradiation.

Rock Calvin B, Hutten Ryan J, Weil Chris R, Lloyd Shane, Kerrigan Kathleen C, Cannon Richard B, Hitchcock Ying J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Given the poor lymphatics of the glottis, we evaluated omission of chemotherapy in patients treated definitely for T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottis.

METHODS

We performed survival analysis of patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis identified in the National Cancer Database treated with radiation alone versus chemoradiation.

RESULTS

A total of 3785 patients were identified. Patients age ≥70 and those with comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI [0.25-0.37] and 0.48 [0.31-0.76], respectively). Five-year OS was lower in patients treated with radiation versus chemoradiation (33.8% [30.3%-37.2%] vs. 58.0% [55.8%-60.0%]). In patients <70 with no comorbidities this difference persisted (51.0% [44.5%-57.0%] versus 66.7% [64.0%-69.3%]).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival was higher in patients treated with chemoradiation compared to radiation alone, even when controlling for age and comorbidities. Radiotherapy with chemotherapy omission is not appropriate in patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis.

Для цитирования: Rock Calvin B, Hutten Ryan J, Weil Chris R, Lloyd Shane, Kerrigan Kathleen C, Cannon Richard B, Hitchcock Ying J. Survival outcomes for patients with T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis treated with definitive radiation alone versus chemoradiation.. Head & neck. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27255.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.