MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41591-025-03572-3

Медицинская библиотека · Nature medicine · 2025

Pelabresib plus ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Rampal Raajit K, Grosicki Sebastian, Chraniuk Dominik, Abruzzese Elisabetta, Bose Prithviraj, Gerds Aaron T, Vannucchi Alessandro M, Palandri Francesca, Lee Sung-Eun, Gupta Vikas, Lucchesi Alessandro, Oh Stephen T, Kuykendall Andrew T, Patriarca Andrea, Álvarez-Larrán Alberto, Mesa Ruben, Kiladjian Jean-Jacques, Talpaz Moshe, Scandura Joseph M, Lavie David, Harris Morgan, Kays Sarah-Katharina, Li Qing, Boxhammer Rainer, Brown Barbara, Jegg Anna-Maria, Harrison Claire N, Mascarenhas John

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors provide limited depth and durability of response in myelofibrosis. We evaluated pelabresib-a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor-plus ruxolitinib (a JAK inhibitor) compared with placebo plus ruxolitinib as first-line therapy. In this phase 3 study (MANIFEST-2), JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib 125 mg once daily (QD; 50-175 mg QD permitted) for 14 days followed by a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or to placebo in combination with ruxolitinib 10 or 15 mg twice daily (BID; 5 mg QD-25 mg BID permitted). Primary endpoint was reduction in spleen volume of ≥35% from baseline at week 24. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in total symptom score (TSS) and TSS50 response (≥50% reduction in TSS from baseline at week 24). The primary endpoint was met in 65.9% of patients randomized to pelabresib-ruxolitinib (n = 214) versus 35.2% to placebo-ruxolitinib (n = 216) (difference, 30.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21.6, 39.3; P < 0.001). Absolute change in TSS was -15.99 versus -14.05 (difference, -1.94; 95% CI, -3.92, 0.04; P = 0.0545) and TSS50 was achieved in 52.3% versus 46.3% (difference, 6.0%; 95 CI, -3.5, 15.5) with pelabresib-ruxolitinib versus placebo-ruxolitinib. Exploratory analyses of proinflammatory cytokine amounts and bone marrow morphology showed greater improvement with the combination. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, occurring in 52.8% (13.2% grade ≥3) versus 37.4% (6.1% grade ≥3) and 44.8% (23.1% grade ≥3) versus 55.1% (36.5% grade ≥3), respectively. Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib is well tolerated, improves signs of underlying myelofibrosis pathobiology and provides substantial clinical benefit over standard-of-care JAK inhibitor monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04603495 .

Для цитирования: Rampal Raajit K, Grosicki Sebastian, Chraniuk Dominik, Abruzzese Elisabetta, Bose Prithviraj, Gerds Aaron T, Vannucchi Alessandro M, Palandri Francesca, Lee Sung-Eun, Gupta Vikas, Lucchesi Alessandro, Oh Stephen T, Kuykendall Andrew T, Patriarca Andrea, Álvarez-Larrán Alberto, Mesa Ruben, Kiladjian Jean-Jacques, Talpaz Moshe, Scandura Joseph M, Lavie David, Harris Morgan, Kays Sarah-Katharina, Li Qing, Boxhammer Rainer, Brown Barbara, Jegg Anna-Maria, Harrison Claire N, Mascarenhas John. Pelabresib plus ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis: a randomized phase 3 trial.. Nature medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03572-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.