Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
Multimodal treatment according to the NPC-GPOH trials in adult patients with nasopharyngeal cancer-Analysis based on a single-center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leu Martin, Bohnenberger Hanibal, Guhlich Manuel, Schirmer Markus Anton, Pilavakis Yiannis, Wolff Hendrik Andreas, Rieken Stefan, Dröge Leif Hendrik
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The German NPC-GPOH trials introduced treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy (RCT) and antiviral treatment in patients aged 25 years or younger with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). We conducted a retrospective study on outcomes of patients at the age of ≥26 years treated accordingly at our institution.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who received primary RCT for NPC were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities, and the Cox regression analysis was used to test for an influence of the variables on outcomes. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via CTCAE criteria and LENT/SOMA criteria, respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were included. Diagnosis was made from 09/1994 to 11/2016. The median 5 year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRC) were 75%, 56%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. We found a negative impact on outcomes (p < .05) in case of older age (OS), history of smoking (OS), and T4 stage/ UICC stage IV (DFS). WHO histologic type significantly influenced outcomes, with best outcomes for type III and worst outcomes for type I. The rates of acute and late toxicities were acceptable.
CONCLUSION: We found excellent outcomes and good feasibility of the NPC-GPOH trials regimen in adult patients. Additionally, we identified patients with outcomes which need to be improved (smokers, histologic type I tumors) and with particularly excellent outcomes (histologic type III tumors). This stimulates further studies on treatment intensification or de-escalation aiming at reduced side effects with optimal tumor control in NPC.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who received primary RCT for NPC were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities, and the Cox regression analysis was used to test for an influence of the variables on outcomes. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via CTCAE criteria and LENT/SOMA criteria, respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were included. Diagnosis was made from 09/1994 to 11/2016. The median 5 year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRC) were 75%, 56%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. We found a negative impact on outcomes (p < .05) in case of older age (OS), history of smoking (OS), and T4 stage/ UICC stage IV (DFS). WHO histologic type significantly influenced outcomes, with best outcomes for type III and worst outcomes for type I. The rates of acute and late toxicities were acceptable.
CONCLUSION: We found excellent outcomes and good feasibility of the NPC-GPOH trials regimen in adult patients. Additionally, we identified patients with outcomes which need to be improved (smokers, histologic type I tumors) and with particularly excellent outcomes (histologic type III tumors). This stimulates further studies on treatment intensification or de-escalation aiming at reduced side effects with optimal tumor control in NPC.