MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.03.006

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2013

Canadian allergists' and nonallergists' perception of epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

Desjardins Marylin, Clarke Ann, Alizadehfar Reza, Grenier Danielle, Eisman Harley, Carr Stuart, Vander Leek Timothy K, Teperman Lee, Higgins Niamh, Joseph Lawrence, Shand Greg, Ben-Shoshan Moshe

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest knowledge gaps about epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the perception of Canadian allergists and nonallergists on issues related to epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

METHODS

Canadian allergists, pediatricians, general practitioners/family physicians and emergency room physicians were recruited through medical associations and surveyed on these issues. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify determinants of specific responses.

RESULTS

One-hundred fourteen allergists and 613 nonallergists participated. For most issues with accepted best practices, allergists were more likely to adhere to recommendations. Allergists versus nonallergists were more likely to recommend intramuscular epinephrine for anaphylaxis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.43-10.11). Older physicians (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), Canadian-Paediatric-Surveillance-Program participants (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96), family physicians (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96), and general practitioners (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52) were less likely to recommend intramuscular use. However, in severe anaphylaxis, >25% of both groups would not give epinephrine for patients presenting with breathing difficulties or hypotension. Use of epinephrine for severe anaphylaxis was less likely in older physicians (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), female physicians (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89), and those practicing in Ontario (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.86), Manitoba (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.90), or Nova-Scotia (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.78). Allergists (OR = 6.22; 95% CI, 3.60-10.72) and physicians treating mainly children (OR = 3.41; 95% CI, 1.87-6.25), or practicing in Quebec (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12-2.55) were more likely to recommend measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in a community facility.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge gaps about mode and indications for epinephrine administration and vaccination policies need to be addressed in future education programs to ensure prompt epinephrine use and to avoid unnecessary restriction of vaccines.

Для цитирования: Desjardins Marylin, Clarke Ann, Alizadehfar Reza, Grenier Danielle, Eisman Harley, Carr Stuart, Vander Leek Timothy K, Teperman Lee, Higgins Niamh, Joseph Lawrence, Shand Greg, Ben-Shoshan Moshe. Canadian allergists' and nonallergists' perception of epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.03.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.