MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista de neurologia · 2016

[Optic neuritis in childhood. A pediatric series, literature review and treatment approach].

Lopez-Martin D, Martinez-Anton J

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In children, the most common form of optic neuritis usually occurs after an infectious disease with papilledema, usually bilateral and has a good prognosis. Conversion to multiple sclerosis is low.

AIM: To present clinical and laboratory case of optic neuritis in pediatrics features.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Seventeen clinical cases of optic neuritis in children and young people aged 4-14 years, referred from 2000 to 2015 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the series was 11 years. They predominated the female patients and infectious history was uncommon; in five of 17 patients was bilateral engagement and four cases evolved with retrobulbar optic neuritis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintensity on T2 in the optic nerves affected in five patients. The study of cerebrospinal fluid and oligoclonal bands was normal in all cases. Patients treated with intravenous methylprednisolone had good recovery. It was found subsequent evolution to multiple sclerosis only in three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the cases that evolved multiple sclerosis showed no clinical differences although they had a higher number of hyperintense lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. This fact, described in previous studies, supports our diagnostic and therapeutic scheme in an attempt to approach the optimal management of this disease.

Для цитирования: Lopez-Martin D, Martinez-Anton J. [Optic neuritis in childhood. A pediatric series, literature review and treatment approach].. Revista de neurologia. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.