AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2003
Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lev Michael H, Romero Javier M, Goodman Daniel N F, Bagga Ranjit, Kim H Young Kwon, Clerk Neil A, Ackerman Robert H, Gonzalez R Gilberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Routine carotid sonography and MR angiography cannot reliably detect the markedly reduced flow velocities associated with very severe carotid stenosis. In this study, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of single row detector helical CT angiography in distinguishing hairline residual lumen from total occlusion of severely stenosed internal carotid arteries (ICAs).
METHODS: From our departmental data base of single row detector CT angiography studies performed for evaluation of ICA occlusive disease, 21 cases were identified with evidence of either hairline residual lumen or total occlusion on correlative conventional catheter radiographic arteriograms; these included seven cases of proved hairline residual lumen and 14 cases of proved total occlusion. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to the radiographic arteriography results, graded the diseased ICA on each CT angiogram as definitely occluded, probably occluded, indeterminate, probably patent, or definitely patent. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each neuroradiologist.
RESULTS: At an operating point on the receiver operating characteristic curve corresponding to 90% sensitivity, the first reader achieved 95% specificity and the second reader achieved 80% specificity for distinguishing hairline residual lumen from total occlusion. Absolute accuracy rates were 95% and 85%, respectively. No significant difference in accuracy was observed between the two readers (P =.28, two-tailed t test).
CONCLUSION: Single row detector CT angiography can distinguish total ICA occlusion from hairline residual lumen with a high degree of accuracy. In equivocal cases, conventional catheter arteriography may be desirable to confirm the diagnosis.
METHODS: From our departmental data base of single row detector CT angiography studies performed for evaluation of ICA occlusive disease, 21 cases were identified with evidence of either hairline residual lumen or total occlusion on correlative conventional catheter radiographic arteriograms; these included seven cases of proved hairline residual lumen and 14 cases of proved total occlusion. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to the radiographic arteriography results, graded the diseased ICA on each CT angiogram as definitely occluded, probably occluded, indeterminate, probably patent, or definitely patent. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each neuroradiologist.
RESULTS: At an operating point on the receiver operating characteristic curve corresponding to 90% sensitivity, the first reader achieved 95% specificity and the second reader achieved 80% specificity for distinguishing hairline residual lumen from total occlusion. Absolute accuracy rates were 95% and 85%, respectively. No significant difference in accuracy was observed between the two readers (P =.28, two-tailed t test).
CONCLUSION: Single row detector CT angiography can distinguish total ICA occlusion from hairline residual lumen with a high degree of accuracy. In equivocal cases, conventional catheter arteriography may be desirable to confirm the diagnosis.