Comparison of the skin microbiota of patients with acne vulgaris and healthy controls.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of the pilosebaceous units which can affect the individual's physiological and psychological health. Abnormal growth of lipophilic anaerobic bacteria such as Propionibacterium acnes is reported to be a major factor in the development of acne. However, the relationship between skin microorganisms and acne has not been fully elucidated. Our study aimed to explore the microbial differences between patients with acne and healthy controls (HCs).
METHODS
The study involved 16 participants diagnosed with acne vulgaris and 5 HCs. We collected skin microbe samples from the cheeks, brow, forehead, neck, chin, or chest of the participants with sterile cotton swabs depending on the location of the acne lesions. Cutaneous microbe samples from the participants were tested by 16s sequencing.
RESULTS
Patients with acne showed increased diversity of skin microbiota in their samples. OTU535601 (Lachnospiraceae), OTU4460604 (Clostridiales), OTU3217705 (Moraxellaceae), OTU1066814 (Prevotella), and OTU455671 (Lactococcus garvieae) were the top 5 most abundant species found in patients with acne but were not present in HCs. OTU423327 (Achromobacter), OTU4423360 (Stenotrophomonas), OTU993127 (Porphyromonas), OTU677680 (Prevotella), and OTU269901 (Pseudomonas) were the top 5 most abundant species in HCs but were not found in patients with acne.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study has analyzed and compared the diversity and abundance of microorganisms and the characteristics of the main pathogenic bacteria in patients with acne and HCs. Our findings indicate the importance of maintaining the skin's commensal microflora balance with the development of acne vulgaris.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.