MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3906/sag-2002-176

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2020

Statistical shape analysis of hand and wrist in paediatric population on radiographs.

Koç Ural, Ercan Ilker, Özdemir Senem, Bolu Semih, Yabaci Ayşegül, Taydaş Onur

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: The goal of this study was to compare differences in hand and wrist shapes and to evaluate these according to growth and allometry in children on radiographs related to bone age.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study included 263 males and 189 females. A total of 452 left hand and wrist radiographs were retrospectively collected. Standard anatomical landmarks marked on radiographs.

RESULTS

There were seen to be significant differences in comparisons of hand and wrist shapes according to sex (P = 0.009). The most suitable model in the growth models was seen as the Gompertz growth model for both females and males (model P < 0.001). For the relationship between shape and size to evaluate allometry, significant models were obtained in females (model P = 0.017, MSE = 0.0002) and in males (model P < 0.001, MSE = 0.0002). In our study, the difference between the sexes was found mostly in the radiocarpal region. It was observed that the deformation of the carpal bones started in the distal row carpal bones.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences were found in hand and wrist shapes according to sex. Models for growth and allometry of hand and wrist shapes were found to be significant in children.

Для цитирования: Koç Ural, Ercan Ilker, Özdemir Senem, Bolu Semih, Yabaci Ayşegül, Taydaş Onur. Statistical shape analysis of hand and wrist in paediatric population on radiographs.. Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2020. DOI: 10.3906/sag-2002-176.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.