The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery · 1996
Suspected intussusception: is ultrasound a reliable diagnostic aid?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wright J E, Slater S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Infantile intussusception often presents with symptoms more common to less dangerous conditions, and diagnosis must be established as early as possible. Clinical diagnosis is often wrong and contrast enema is invasive. Sonography is painless and harmless and if it provides a reliable method of diagnosis or exclusion of intussusception, diagnostic delay will be avoided.
METHODS: In the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, between 1993 and 1994, the names of all children referred for abdominal sonography with a degree of suspicion of intussusception were recorded, and the histories were subsequently reviewed.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied. Forty-one patients had no sonographic evidence of intussusception and nine patients had positive findings. None of the 41 patients who had negative sonograms proved to have intussusception. The nine patients who had positive findings were subjected to air enema. In two patients the sonographic diagnosis was proved wrong. In the other seven patients it was confirmed. Thus there were two false positives and no false negatives.
CONCLUSION: Sonography is a reliable aid to the clinical diagnosis of intussusception.
METHODS: In the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, between 1993 and 1994, the names of all children referred for abdominal sonography with a degree of suspicion of intussusception were recorded, and the histories were subsequently reviewed.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied. Forty-one patients had no sonographic evidence of intussusception and nine patients had positive findings. None of the 41 patients who had negative sonograms proved to have intussusception. The nine patients who had positive findings were subjected to air enema. In two patients the sonographic diagnosis was proved wrong. In the other seven patients it was confirmed. Thus there were two false positives and no false negatives.
CONCLUSION: Sonography is a reliable aid to the clinical diagnosis of intussusception.