American journal of therapeutics · 2019
Procedural Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jayanna Manju Bengaluru, Mohsen Ala, Inampudi Chakradhari, Alvarez Paulino, Giudici Michael C, Briasoulis Alexandros
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is being increasingly performed for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). Heart failure (HF) frequently coexists with AF because they share common risk factors.
STUDY QUESTION: This study aims at identifying the characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients with HF undergoing catheter ablation of AF.
STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 264 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF. Seventy-three patients (28%) had a known history of stage C HF either with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction.
MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: We compared procedural outcomes between patients who had known HF with those who did not.
RESULTS: Patients with HF were more likely to have higher rates of atrial fibrillation recurrence at both 3 months (odds ratio 2.9, confidence interval = 1.5-5.7, P = 0.0022) and 1 year after the procedure (odds ratio 2.3, confidence interval 1.2-4.3, P = 0.0097) and risk factors for recurrence of AF including left atrial enlargement, persistent AF, and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score. However, on logistic regression analysis adjusting for left atrial size, atrial fibrillation type (persistent vs. paroxysmal), and CHA2DS2-VASc score as covariates, there was no significant difference in AF recurrence rates at both 3 months and 1 year. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly between patients with HF either with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction. Among patients with paroxysmal AF, HF was predictive of AF recurrence at both 3 months and 1 year after ablation. The procedure length was longer in patients with HF, but there were no differences in periprocedural complications.
CONCLUSION: Patients with HF undergoing catheter ablation of AF tend to have more risk factors for recurrence, but after adjustment for risk factors, the recurrence rates were similar at 3 months and 1 year. Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, HF was predictive of higher recurrence rates.
STUDY QUESTION: This study aims at identifying the characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients with HF undergoing catheter ablation of AF.
STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 264 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF. Seventy-three patients (28%) had a known history of stage C HF either with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction.
MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: We compared procedural outcomes between patients who had known HF with those who did not.
RESULTS: Patients with HF were more likely to have higher rates of atrial fibrillation recurrence at both 3 months (odds ratio 2.9, confidence interval = 1.5-5.7, P = 0.0022) and 1 year after the procedure (odds ratio 2.3, confidence interval 1.2-4.3, P = 0.0097) and risk factors for recurrence of AF including left atrial enlargement, persistent AF, and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score. However, on logistic regression analysis adjusting for left atrial size, atrial fibrillation type (persistent vs. paroxysmal), and CHA2DS2-VASc score as covariates, there was no significant difference in AF recurrence rates at both 3 months and 1 year. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly between patients with HF either with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction. Among patients with paroxysmal AF, HF was predictive of AF recurrence at both 3 months and 1 year after ablation. The procedure length was longer in patients with HF, but there were no differences in periprocedural complications.
CONCLUSION: Patients with HF undergoing catheter ablation of AF tend to have more risk factors for recurrence, but after adjustment for risk factors, the recurrence rates were similar at 3 months and 1 year. Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, HF was predictive of higher recurrence rates.