Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025
Long-term retrieval performance is associated with CA1 hippocampal volume in older adults and individuals at risk for dementia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bartels Claudia, Tzu-Yueh Chen Joy, Belz Michael, Yakupov Renat, Düzel Emrah, Glanz Wenzel, Lüsebrink Falk, Dechent Peter, Kleineidam Luca, Stark Melina, Spottke Annika, Coenjaerts Marie, Fließbach Klaus, Schneider Anja, Rostamzadeh Ayda, Jessen Frank, H Schott Björn, Wiltfang Jens, Frommann Ingo, Wagner Michael, Goya-Maldonado Roberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Long-term retrieval (LTR) and accelerated long-term forgetting (ALF) paradigms might help differentiating individuals at increased dementia risk from healthy controls (HC).
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the utility of a LTR paradigm in discriminating subjective cognitive decline (SCD) from HC and its relationship to the CA1 body volume, a hippocampal structure pivotal to the memory circuitry.
METHODS: LTR was assessed via recall rates of the ADAS-cog word list and the FCSRT-IR free recall in 59 DELCODE study participants, including individuals with SCD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as well as HC, all of them DELCODE study participants. LTR performance was compared between groups and its discriminability between SCD and HC was assessed using ROC curve analysis. 32 SCD and HC participants had FreeSurfer-segmented MRI data, and hippocampal subfield volumes were correlated with LTR rates.
RESULTS: Only FCSRT-IR LTR rates sufficiently differentiated SCD from HC (AUC of 0.701; 95% CI 0.537-0.865). Moderate associations of the FCSRT-IR LTR rate with CA1 bodies in both hemispheres (left CA1 body r = 0.419, p = 0.017; right: r = 0.412, p = 0.019), in addition to the left C3 body were observed (r = 0.525, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: LTR may constitute a potential indicator of memory circuitry integrity in older adults, which is also mirrored by its association with CA1 volume. Thus, assessment of LTR and associated neural circuits may help to better identify individuals at risk for future cognitive decline today indistinguishable from HC, ultimately paving the way for early intervention.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the utility of a LTR paradigm in discriminating subjective cognitive decline (SCD) from HC and its relationship to the CA1 body volume, a hippocampal structure pivotal to the memory circuitry.
METHODS: LTR was assessed via recall rates of the ADAS-cog word list and the FCSRT-IR free recall in 59 DELCODE study participants, including individuals with SCD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as well as HC, all of them DELCODE study participants. LTR performance was compared between groups and its discriminability between SCD and HC was assessed using ROC curve analysis. 32 SCD and HC participants had FreeSurfer-segmented MRI data, and hippocampal subfield volumes were correlated with LTR rates.
RESULTS: Only FCSRT-IR LTR rates sufficiently differentiated SCD from HC (AUC of 0.701; 95% CI 0.537-0.865). Moderate associations of the FCSRT-IR LTR rate with CA1 bodies in both hemispheres (left CA1 body r = 0.419, p = 0.017; right: r = 0.412, p = 0.019), in addition to the left C3 body were observed (r = 0.525, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: LTR may constitute a potential indicator of memory circuitry integrity in older adults, which is also mirrored by its association with CA1 volume. Thus, assessment of LTR and associated neural circuits may help to better identify individuals at risk for future cognitive decline today indistinguishable from HC, ultimately paving the way for early intervention.