Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2014
Phase I clinical trial of pegylated liposomal mitoxantrone plm60-s: pharmacokinetics, toxicity and preliminary efficacy.
Клиническое исследование I фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Jianliang, Shi Yuankai, Li Chunlei, Gui Lin, Zhao Xi, Liu Peng, Han Xiaohong, Song Yuanyuan, Li Ning, Du Ping, Zhang Shuxiang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Plm60-s is a pegylated liposomal mitoxantrone formulation, in which mitoxantrone was loaded into small unilamellar vesicles (~60 nm) made from solid lipid membrane. This two-arm, dose-escalating phase I study was designed to determine safety and pharmacokinetics of plm60-s, and to compare with those of conventional mitoxantrone injection (c-MI).
METHODS: Patients received an intravenous infusion of plm60-s at 6, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. Three or 6 patients were in each group of dose level. If more than one third patients of a group experienced dose-limiting toxicity, dose climbing will stop. The control group of 3 patients received c-MI at 10 mg/m(2) every 28 days. Samples for pharmacokinetic studies were collected. The analysis of the safety and tolerability was done according to the record and laboratory examination, etc.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. One grade 3 leukocytopenia occurred in plm60-s groups. Plm60-s was safer than c-MI at the same dose of 10 mg/m(2). Two complete responses and one partial response occurred in plm60-s group. In plasma, plm60-s exhibited sustained release of the content, resulting in the reduced peak concentrations and enhanced AUC of released MIT. Total mitoxantrone was linearly cleared, and mitoxantrone was predominantly in the liposomal encapsulation form. Repeated administration of plm60-s did not affect the clearance kinetics.
CONCLUSIONS: At a dose of up to 18 mg/m(2), plm60-s could be well tolerated and potential efficacy could be observed. The pharmacokinetic profile of plm60-s was remarkably altered. Further investigations are in progression.
METHODS: Patients received an intravenous infusion of plm60-s at 6, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. Three or 6 patients were in each group of dose level. If more than one third patients of a group experienced dose-limiting toxicity, dose climbing will stop. The control group of 3 patients received c-MI at 10 mg/m(2) every 28 days. Samples for pharmacokinetic studies were collected. The analysis of the safety and tolerability was done according to the record and laboratory examination, etc.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. One grade 3 leukocytopenia occurred in plm60-s groups. Plm60-s was safer than c-MI at the same dose of 10 mg/m(2). Two complete responses and one partial response occurred in plm60-s group. In plasma, plm60-s exhibited sustained release of the content, resulting in the reduced peak concentrations and enhanced AUC of released MIT. Total mitoxantrone was linearly cleared, and mitoxantrone was predominantly in the liposomal encapsulation form. Repeated administration of plm60-s did not affect the clearance kinetics.
CONCLUSIONS: At a dose of up to 18 mg/m(2), plm60-s could be well tolerated and potential efficacy could be observed. The pharmacokinetic profile of plm60-s was remarkably altered. Further investigations are in progression.