MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/vbz.2011.0839

Медицинская библиотека · Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2012

Trends in national surveillance data for bat rabies in the United States: 2001-2009.

Patyk Kelly, Turmelle Amy, Blanton Jesse D, Rupprecht Charles E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Rabies remains an important public health concern in the United States, with most human cases associated with bat rabies virus variants. Cases of rabies virus (RV) infection in bats are widely distributed across the continental United States and elsewhere in the Americas. In this retrospective study, data on bats submitted to state laboratories for RV diagnosis between 2001 and 2009 were analyzed to investigate epidemiological trends in the United States. Season, region, and roosting habits were the primary risk factors of interest. During the study interval, more than 205,439 bats were submitted for RV diagnosis, and 6.7% of these bats were rabid. Increased odds of a submitted bat being rabid were associated with species that exhibit inconspicuous roosting habits, bats originating in the Southwest, and bats submitted for diagnosis during the fall. Periodic analysis of zoonotic disease surveillance is recommended to detect changes in trends regarding geographic distribution, seasonal fluctuations, and host associations; this is particularly necessary, as existing trends may be influenced by climate change or other emerging factors.

Для цитирования: Patyk Kelly, Turmelle Amy, Blanton Jesse D, Rupprecht Charles E. Trends in national surveillance data for bat rabies in the United States: 2001-2009.. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.). 2012. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0839.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.