Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1994
A retrospective assessment of the clinical value of jejunal disaccharidase analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duncan A, Park R P, Lee F D, Russell R I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The measurement of jejunal disaccharidases is used by several gastroenterologists when investigating suspected small-bowel disease. The clinical value of this analysis is assessed.
METHOD: The histology and disaccharidase results in 1585 jejunal biopsy specimens were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Disaccharidase and histology results concurred in most cases (72%). However, disaccharidases were an insensitive indicator of small-bowel disease: low levels were found in only 65% of coeliac patients with villous atrophy, 15% of patients with giardiasis, and 6% of patients with villous atrophy associated with non-coeliac histology. Low disaccharidase levels were sometimes found in patients with normal histology (1.6%) and when biopsy specimens were unwittingly taken from non-jejunal sites (1.4%). Isolated low lactase activities were found in 3.2%. Usually this finding was not clinically relevant because patients had no symptoms of lactose intolerance (38%), had another diagnosis that responded to appropriate treatment (8%), or had no response to a low-lactose diet (14%). In 16 patients sucrase activities were markedly low, and this investigation proved central to the diagnosis of sucrase-alpha-dextrinase deficiency, which was subsequently confirmed in 9.
CONCLUSION: Jejunal disaccharidases are clinically useful only in the diagnosis of sucrase-alpha-dextrinase deficiency. We recommend that their measurement be reserved for the investigation of patients suspected of having this condition.
METHOD: The histology and disaccharidase results in 1585 jejunal biopsy specimens were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Disaccharidase and histology results concurred in most cases (72%). However, disaccharidases were an insensitive indicator of small-bowel disease: low levels were found in only 65% of coeliac patients with villous atrophy, 15% of patients with giardiasis, and 6% of patients with villous atrophy associated with non-coeliac histology. Low disaccharidase levels were sometimes found in patients with normal histology (1.6%) and when biopsy specimens were unwittingly taken from non-jejunal sites (1.4%). Isolated low lactase activities were found in 3.2%. Usually this finding was not clinically relevant because patients had no symptoms of lactose intolerance (38%), had another diagnosis that responded to appropriate treatment (8%), or had no response to a low-lactose diet (14%). In 16 patients sucrase activities were markedly low, and this investigation proved central to the diagnosis of sucrase-alpha-dextrinase deficiency, which was subsequently confirmed in 9.
CONCLUSION: Jejunal disaccharidases are clinically useful only in the diagnosis of sucrase-alpha-dextrinase deficiency. We recommend that their measurement be reserved for the investigation of patients suspected of having this condition.