MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/fam0001046

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022

Transgression-related co-rumination: Scale validation and prediction of relational outcomes.

Thai Michael, Wenzel Michael, Okimoto Tyler G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Co-rumination refers to the extended and/or recurring discussion of issues in social relationships. The extant research tends to conceptualize co-rumination in terms of general interaction styles, commonly between individuals who act as a source of support for one another. Little work has examined co-rumination in conflict contexts, between victims and offenders, as an event-specific process to come to terms with wrongdoing. The present research develops and validates a new scale measuring three distinct approaches to transgression-related co-rumination: co-reflection, co-brooding, and co-avoidance. Within the context of close romantic relationships, we show that these new co-rumination scales are associated with conciliatory sentiments including victim forgiveness, offender self-forgiveness, and relationship commitment. This research highlights co-rumination between parties as an important mechanism to consider in the process of relationship repair. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Для цитирования: Thai Michael, Wenzel Michael, Okimoto Tyler G. Transgression-related co-rumination: Scale validation and prediction of relational outcomes.. Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43). 2022. DOI: 10.1037/fam0001046.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.