DOI 10.1007/s40520-023-02609-2
Genetic predisposition to white blood cells in relation to the risk of frailty.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Observational studies have suggested an association between white blood cells (WBCs) and frailty, but considering the susceptibility to reverse causality and confounding, the causal direction and magnitude of this association remain ambiguous. Our aim was to investigate the causal effect of WBCs on frailty by means of a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
METHODS
Based on the genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics data provided by the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), we carried out a two-sample MR study. We applied the genetically predicted independent WBCs from GWAS as a measure of exposure data. The Rockwood Frailty Index (FI) was used as outcome measure, which was derived from a meta-analysis from GWAS in UK Biobank European ancestry participants and Swedish TwinGene participants. Our study applied inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) and outlier test (MR-PRESSO) methods to explore relationships between various WBCs and frailty.
RESULTS
In our study, a possible causal relationship between eosinophil levels and frailty was demonstrated by two-sample MR analysis. Eosinophils were associated with FI (beta:0.0609; 95% CI 0.0382, 0.0836; P = 1.38E-07). Our results suggest that as the level of eosinophils increases, so does the risk of frailty. No meaningful causal relationship between neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes or basophils and FI was found in the MR results (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
According to this MR study, higher eosinophil counts are related to an increased risk of frailty. To validate these findings and investigate the mechanisms underlying these connections, future studies are warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.