International journal of clinical oncology · 2013
Safety and effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological confirmation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakanaka Katsuyuki, Matsuo Yukinori, Nagata Yasushi, Maki Sayo, Shibuya Keiko, Norihisa Yoshiki, Narabayashi Masaru, Ueki Nami, Mizowaki Takashi, Hiraoka Masahiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pathological diagnosis fails in some pulmonary tumors, although they may be highly suspected to be primary lung cancer. We studied the outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological confirmation.
METHODS: The current study included 37 patients (39 lesions) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy who were clinically diagnosed with primary stage I lung cancer between August 1998 and April 2009 at our hospital. Pulmonary tumors were highly suspected to be malignant from physical and imaging examinations. Biopsies were performed for 62 % of patients, although malignancy was not pathologically confirmed. In the other 38 % of patients, a biopsy was not feasible. Median age of the patients was 77 years. Median tumor diameter was 20 mm. A total median dose of 48 Gy was prescribed to the isocenter in four fractions. Median follow-up period was 39 months.
RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival, local control, and regional-distant control were 74.2, 94.0, and 68.6 %, respectively. In patients with tumors ≤20 mm, overall survival and regional-distant control were significantly higher than in patients with tumors >20 mm (p ≤ 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed regarding local control. No grade 3-5 adverse events possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe and effective for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer when pathological diagnosis is difficult even with repeat biopsies, or a biopsy is not feasible for reasons of the patient's health condition or wishes.
METHODS: The current study included 37 patients (39 lesions) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy who were clinically diagnosed with primary stage I lung cancer between August 1998 and April 2009 at our hospital. Pulmonary tumors were highly suspected to be malignant from physical and imaging examinations. Biopsies were performed for 62 % of patients, although malignancy was not pathologically confirmed. In the other 38 % of patients, a biopsy was not feasible. Median age of the patients was 77 years. Median tumor diameter was 20 mm. A total median dose of 48 Gy was prescribed to the isocenter in four fractions. Median follow-up period was 39 months.
RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival, local control, and regional-distant control were 74.2, 94.0, and 68.6 %, respectively. In patients with tumors ≤20 mm, overall survival and regional-distant control were significantly higher than in patients with tumors >20 mm (p ≤ 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed regarding local control. No grade 3-5 adverse events possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe and effective for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer when pathological diagnosis is difficult even with repeat biopsies, or a biopsy is not feasible for reasons of the patient's health condition or wishes.