Clinical and dermatoscopic characteristics of lichen planus-like keratosis in a West-Asian population.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE
The clinical and dermatoscopic features of lichen planus-like keratosis have been described but the characteristics of this entity in a West-Asian population are not known.
METHODS
We retrospectively analysed 82 histopathologically verified cases of lichen planus-like keratosis from 81 patients from Iran and Turkey.
RESULTS
The majority of lichen planus-like keratoses were macules (61% n = 50), clinically pigmented (67.1% n = 55) and dermatoscopically multi-coloured (91.5% n = 75). The majority (63.4%) had a single dermatoscopic pattern, most frequently: structureless (35.4%), dots (14.6%) and angulated lines (8.5%). Of the lesions with more than one pattern (n = 30), the majority (n = 21) had asymmetry of pattern, the most common combinations being structureless plus dots (n = 8) and structureless plus angulated lines (n = 5). The most common structure was pigmented dots, most frequently grey and present in 70.7% of cases. Vessels were seen in 30.5% of lesions, being significantly more prevalent in non-pigmented, than pigmented, lichen planus-like keratoses (83.3% vs. 21.4% P < 0.001). When we compared lichen planus-like keratosis in the current study to that entity in a large North American study, the statistically significant differences in a West-Asian population included a greater frequency of pigmented variants, a lower incidence in females and a lower prevalence on the torso, in favour of the face.
CONCLUSIONS
Lichen planus-like keratosis in a West-Asian population has clinical and dermatoscopic similarities to that entity in another studied population. The significant differences in gender association and anatomical site may be secondary to cultural factors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.