Comparison of topical 0.3% ofloxacin to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in the therapy of bacterial keratitis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In this study we compared topical ofloxacin with a combination of fortified tobramycin sulphate and cefazolin sodium solutions in the treatment of culture-proved bacterial keratitis.
METHODS
30 eyes of culture-proved bacterial corneal ulcers of moderate severity were included in a prospective randomized, controlled, double-masked study for comparison. The cases were randomly allocated to treatment with 0.3% ofloxacin solution (Group I) and combination of fortified antibiotics (1.5% tobramycin and 5% cefazolin solutions--Group II as control) along with supportive cycloplegic, vitamins and antiglaucoma therapy. Time for healing of ulcer and subjective symptoms were main outcome measures. Student's t-test was used to compare the results.
RESULTS
Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the two most common organisms isolated. Resolution of the ulcer was achieved in 93% and 87% in the treated and the control group, respectively. The mean duration of symptomatic relief was 7.8 +/- 1.54 days in the treated group and 8.33 +/- 1.44 days in the control group; for epithelial healing it was 15.0 +/- 3.86 days in the treated group and 15.46 +/- 3.86 days in the control group. Post resolution the best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or better was achieved in all but one eye each in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Both ofloxacin 0.3% and combined fortified tobramycin 1.5% and cefazolin 5% topical drops were comparable for treating cases of bacterial corneal ulcer of moderate severity. However, considering the easy availability and cost effectiveness of ofloxacin, a monotherapy with ofloxacin may be preferred over the combined, fortified tobramycin and cefazolin therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.