Surgical endoscopy · 1997
Laparoscopic splenectomy. The emerging standard.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Glasgow R E, Yee L F, Mulvihill S J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at the University of California, San Francisco.
METHODS: The medical records of the initial 52 unselected patients undergoing LS were reviewed and compared to 28 concurrently treated open splenectomy patients (OS).
RESULTS: Patients did not differ with regard to age, gender, body, or splenic weights. The operative time was longer in the LS patients (mean 196 vs 156 min), but the length of stay and duration of ileus were shorter in the LS group. For adult patients admitted exclusively for splenectomy, operative times did not differ between LS and OS and total hospital cost was less in the LS group (mean $8, 939 vs $14,022). Six patients required conversion to OS, four occurring in the first 11 patients treated (overall conversion rate of 11%). Three patients died from complications related to their underlying disease. Two other major complications occurred. Complication rates and transfusion requirements did not differ between OS and LS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open splenectomy for treatment of hematologic diseases in patients of all ages.
METHODS: The medical records of the initial 52 unselected patients undergoing LS were reviewed and compared to 28 concurrently treated open splenectomy patients (OS).
RESULTS: Patients did not differ with regard to age, gender, body, or splenic weights. The operative time was longer in the LS patients (mean 196 vs 156 min), but the length of stay and duration of ileus were shorter in the LS group. For adult patients admitted exclusively for splenectomy, operative times did not differ between LS and OS and total hospital cost was less in the LS group (mean $8, 939 vs $14,022). Six patients required conversion to OS, four occurring in the first 11 patients treated (overall conversion rate of 11%). Three patients died from complications related to their underlying disease. Two other major complications occurred. Complication rates and transfusion requirements did not differ between OS and LS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open splenectomy for treatment of hematologic diseases in patients of all ages.