American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2005
The effects of hormone replacement on the biomechanical properties of the uterosacral and round ligaments in the monkey model.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vardy Michael D, Gardner Thomas R, Cosman Felicia, Scotti Richard J, Mikhail Magdy S, Preiss-Bloom A Orahn, Williams J Koudy, Cline J Mark, Lindsay Robert
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine effects of ovariectomy (OVX) and conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA), or ethinyl estradiol plus norethindrone acetate (EE/NA) on biomechanics of uterosacral (USL) and round (RL) ligaments in postmenopausal (PMP) monkeys.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, triple blind, placebo-controlled study. OVX monkeys received 12 months no treatment (Pbo) (n = 19), CEE/MPA (n = 19), or EE/NA (n = 21). USL and RL step strains and stress-relaxation data were curve-fitted, giving strain-dependent tensile modulus (TM) from 0% to 30%.
RESULTS: (1) USL: TM for both treatment groups was greater than Pbo for strains from 0% to 12% (P < .04). (2) RL: TM for both treatment groups was smaller than Pbo for strains from 12% to 30% (P < .05). No differences were found between treatment regimens.
CONCLUSION: CEE/MPA and EE/NA both affect functional biomechanical properties by increasing tensile stiffness in the USL and decreasing it in the RL.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, triple blind, placebo-controlled study. OVX monkeys received 12 months no treatment (Pbo) (n = 19), CEE/MPA (n = 19), or EE/NA (n = 21). USL and RL step strains and stress-relaxation data were curve-fitted, giving strain-dependent tensile modulus (TM) from 0% to 30%.
RESULTS: (1) USL: TM for both treatment groups was greater than Pbo for strains from 0% to 12% (P < .04). (2) RL: TM for both treatment groups was smaller than Pbo for strains from 12% to 30% (P < .05). No differences were found between treatment regimens.
CONCLUSION: CEE/MPA and EE/NA both affect functional biomechanical properties by increasing tensile stiffness in the USL and decreasing it in the RL.