Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
The cognitive and neural bases of creative thought: A cross-domain systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation studies.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Melody M Y, Cho Eugene, Lambon Ralph Matthew A, Robinson Gail A
Аннотация
Creative thought enables humans to flexibly generate, evaluate and select novel and adaptive ideas across different contexts. Decades of research indicates that it involves two key aspects: retrieval of previously acquired knowledge and manipulation of that knowledge. However, the cognitive processes underpinning these aspects remain underspecified. The broader clinical-cognitive neuroscience literature suggests these functions rely on general-purpose cognitive mechanisms supporting semantic cognition, controlled episodic memory retrieval, and executive mechanisms. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique widely used in creativity and cognitive neuroscience research to examine causal brain-behaviour relationships. To identify converging evidence toward a unifying neurocognitive account of creative thought, we reviewed and meta-analysed 145 sham-controlled tDCS studies (involving 8399 healthy participants aged 18-40), drawn from electronic databases and previous reviews, across creativity and relevant cognitive neuroscience literatures. The results revealed that, only left lateral frontal anodal tDCS promotes creativity (p < .01). In parallel, anodal tDCS over the same region also promotes improvement in many other cognitive processes, including more efficient processing of semantic knowledge (p < .05), more accurate episodic memory retrieval (p < .05), better and more efficient manipulation of buffered knowledge (all p < .001), better self-initiated response generation (i.e., energization; p < .05), and more efficient response selection amongst competing options (i.e., task-setting; p < .01). By merging these previously separate literatures, tDCS studies - although heavily biased toward frontal montages - support the notion that creative thought arises from general-purpose cognitive mechanisms including controlled retrieval and temporary storage of semantic and episodic information, as well as executive mechanisms.