MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12028-015-0162-5

Медицинская библиотека · Neurocritical care · 2016

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Complications, Outcomes, and Mortality.

Modi Sumul, Dharaiya Devanshi, Schultz Lonni, Varelas Panayiotis

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our study objective was to identify real-world rates of complications, mortality, and outcomes in patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) over the last decade in the United States.

METHODS

A total of 1346 patients were obtained from the nationwide inpatient sample for the years 2002-2011. Common complications known to be associated with NMS were identified. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

The most prevalent complication was rhabdomyolysis (30.1%). Other common complications were acute respiratory failure (16.1%), acute kidney injury (17.7%), sepsis (6.2%), and other systemic infections. Unadjusted mortality rate was 5.6%. Older age, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and comorbid congestive heart failure were significant predictors of mortality. Acute respiratory failure was the strongest independent mortality predictor (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our large sample population-based study on NMS, we were able to identify the rates of several preselected complications and the mortality. The identification of independent mortality predictors in this study can guide physicians in the management and prognostication of this rare syndrome.

Для цитирования: Modi Sumul, Dharaiya Devanshi, Schultz Lonni, Varelas Panayiotis. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Complications, Outcomes, and Mortality.. Neurocritical care. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0162-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.