MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society · 1999

Is the face and neck pattern of atopic dermatitis in Japan a special variant?

Tada J, Yamasaki H, Toi Y, Akiyama H, Arata J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Adult atopic dermatitis (AD) with severe and refractory eruptions on the face, neck, and upper trunk, although quite rare in western countries, has increased in Japan.

OBJECTIVE

We have tried to clarify the possible causative factors for this particular type of AD, predominantly seen in Japan.

METHODS

Eighty-seven AD patients (37 men and 50 women) who had severe and refractory facial and neck lesions were patch tested with topical medicaments, cosmetics, and skin-management products.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (42. 5%) patients showed positive reactions to more than one of those products: 14 patients to shampoo, rinse, or soap; 11 to topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs); 7 to cosmetics; and 6 to corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

We believe that topical NSAIDs, (which are often prescribed for the treatment of AD in Japan and rarely used for the treatment of eczamatous skin disorders in western countries), as well as common detergents, play important roles in the increased prevalence of AD patients with severe and refractory lesions on the face, neck, and upper trunk in Japan.

Для цитирования: Tada J, Yamasaki H, Toi Y, Akiyama H, Arata J. Is the face and neck pattern of atopic dermatitis in Japan a special variant?. American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society. 1999.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.