MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112908

Медицинская библиотека · Psychiatry research · 2020

Preliminary evaluation of the utility of parental ratings in a Child Network.

Post Robert M, Rowe Michael, Kaplin Dana B, Findling Robert

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Children in the US have a high incidence of psychiatric disorders, but the symptoms of these illnesses are often poorly recognized and treated. We thus created a Child Network for parents of children aged 2-12 to rate their child on a weekly basis on a secure website so that longitudinal ratings could be easily visualized.

METHODS

After giving informed consent, parents filled out: a one-time questionnaire and a 97 item Child Checklist; and then rated the severity of depression, anxiety, ADHD, oppositional behavior, and mania each week. The new Checklist ratings were correlated with the 23 previous validated in adults (the M-3), and symptom burden was compared with diagnoses received in the community.

RESULTS

The 23 item M-3 ratings were highly correlated with the more extensive Child Checklist. Symptom severity also corresponded to diagnoses received in the community. An example of the longitudinal weekly ratings of a child with a dysphoric mania is also presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The convergence of scores on the adult and child portions of the Child Checklist and the ease of visualization of symptoms and response to treatment suggest the utility of the ratings in the Child Network.

Для цитирования: Post Robert M, Rowe Michael, Kaplin Dana B, Findling Robert. Preliminary evaluation of the utility of parental ratings in a Child Network.. Psychiatry research. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112908.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.