MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0264-410x(94)00021-e

Медицинская библиотека · Vaccine · 1995

MMR vaccination, measles epidemiology and sero-surveillance in the Republic of Ireland.

Johnson H, Hillary I B, McQuoid G, Gilmer B A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Following the introduction of a national measles and subsequent MMR vaccination programme, to determine the susceptibility of 3-14-year-old children to measles, mumps and rubella and to relate the results to the epidemiology of measles and the need for vaccination policy changes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional sero-survey and trends in measles notifications and mortality.

SETTING

Paediatric hospital outpatient departments in Dublin.

SUBJECTS: Sera were collected from 837 children attending the clinics in 1991 and 1992.

RESULTS

The prevalence of antibodies in children aged 3-6, 7-10 and 11-14 years was 84, 83 and 95% for measles; 48, 60 and 65% for mumps; and 78, 63 and 74% for rubella, respectively. The prevalence of mumps antibodies may be underestimated. Ninety-six per cent of girls aged 13-14 years had rubella antibodies. A widespread outbreak of measles occurred in 1993. Over recent years, an increasing proportion of measles notifications were in older children.

CONCLUSION

Given sub-optimal uptake of MMR vaccine, outbreaks of infection in pre- and primary school children are inevitable. In such circumstances, a 2-shot MMR vaccine programme with high uptake is essential to prevent a shift of disease into older age groups.

Для цитирования: Johnson H, Hillary I B, McQuoid G, Gilmer B A. MMR vaccination, measles epidemiology and sero-surveillance in the Republic of Ireland.. Vaccine. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)00021-e.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.