MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001188

Медицинская библиотека · Stroke · 2013

Protamine does not increase risk of stroke in patients with elective carotid stenting.

McDonald Jennifer S, Kallmes David F, Lanzino Giuseppe, Cloft Harry J

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reversal of anticoagulation with protamine might predispose to a higher risk of stroke in patients with carotid stenting. We evaluated a national, multihospital patient database to examine the risk of stroke in patients with carotid stenting receiving protamine compared with those who did not.

METHODS

The Premier Perspective database was used to identify patients who were electively hospitalized for carotid stenting from 2006 through 2011. The incidence of in-hospital mortality and morbidity was compared between patients who did and did not receive protamine after propensity score adjustment via 1:1 matching to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

Of 6664 patients with carotid stenting treated at 193 hospitals, 556 (8%) received protamine on the day of the procedure. After matching by propensity score, patients who received protamine had a similar likelihood of stroke or transient ischemic attack (P=0.77), in-hospital mortality (P=0.12), discharge to long-term care (P=0.15), and access site complications (P=0.90) as compared with patients who did not receive protamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Protamine administration is not associated with additional risk of adverse events after carotid stenting.

Для цитирования: McDonald Jennifer S, Kallmes David F, Lanzino Giuseppe, Cloft Harry J. Protamine does not increase risk of stroke in patients with elective carotid stenting.. Stroke. 2013. DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001188.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.