European journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026
Efficacy of 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Arresting Dental Caries in Paediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alqadi A, Qubbaj L, Saleh B, Al-Najdawi M, Haswa En, Haswa Em
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) in arresting dental caries in paediatric patients in comparison to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) or placebo.
MATERIALS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 596949). A thorough search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, retrieving 1366 studies. Duplicates were removed, yielding 892 unique records. Screening by title and abstract reduced this number to 96 studies, and after full-text review, 6 RCTS met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) software 8.7.0, applying a random-effects model to account for variability across studies, and a sensitivity analysis was performed.
CONCLUSION: 38% SDF is an effective intervention for halting dental caries in paediatric patients, slightly outperforming ART. Both interventions may be considered for paediatric patients. Further standardised research with extended follow-up is needed.
MATERIALS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 596949). A thorough search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, retrieving 1366 studies. Duplicates were removed, yielding 892 unique records. Screening by title and abstract reduced this number to 96 studies, and after full-text review, 6 RCTS met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) software 8.7.0, applying a random-effects model to account for variability across studies, and a sensitivity analysis was performed.
CONCLUSION: 38% SDF is an effective intervention for halting dental caries in paediatric patients, slightly outperforming ART. Both interventions may be considered for paediatric patients. Further standardised research with extended follow-up is needed.