European journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026
Effectiveness of chlorhexidine and xylitol varnish versus silver diamine fluoride in the control of initial dental caries lesions: a randomised clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Magalhães Cairo G, Cardoso Oliveira M, Meira Maia V, Neves Oliveira I F, Neves Souza Gomes M J, Augusto Casotti C
Аннотация
AIM: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a chlorhexidine (2%) and xylitol (5%) varnish (VCX) versus a silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution (30%) in controlling initial dental caries lesions in young children.
METHODS: A randomised clinical trial was conducted with children aged 5 and 6 from public schools in Jequié, Bahia. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: one treated with VCX, another with SDF, and a control group that received no intervention. Carious lesions were classified using ICDAS-II criteria, and interventions were applied following standardised clinical protocols. Blinding was applied to participants, though not to researchers due to physical differences in treatment materials.
CONCLUSION: Both VCX and SDF were effective in reducing initial dental caries lesions, with SDF showing superior efficacy. However, VCX may serve as a viable alternative for patients concerned with aesthetics, though further studies are required to confirm its long-term effectiveness and optimise treatment protocols.
METHODS: A randomised clinical trial was conducted with children aged 5 and 6 from public schools in Jequié, Bahia. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: one treated with VCX, another with SDF, and a control group that received no intervention. Carious lesions were classified using ICDAS-II criteria, and interventions were applied following standardised clinical protocols. Blinding was applied to participants, though not to researchers due to physical differences in treatment materials.
CONCLUSION: Both VCX and SDF were effective in reducing initial dental caries lesions, with SDF showing superior efficacy. However, VCX may serve as a viable alternative for patients concerned with aesthetics, though further studies are required to confirm its long-term effectiveness and optimise treatment protocols.