Combined Molecular and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Is Beneficial in Detection of ESBL and AmpC Beta-Lactamase Producing Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Pediatric Patients with Bloodstream Infections.
Аннотация
Objectives
The aim was to assess the potential advantage of combined genotypic testing with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to detect AmpC β-lactamases (AmpC) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from blood cultures in a pediatric population. Materials and
Methods
All first-time Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered from blood cultures of pediatric patients at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2018 were evaluated. The Check-MDR CT103XL β-lactamase assay was used to determine the presence of AmpC and ESBL, while AST was performed using the VITEK 2 platform. Phenotypic ESBL resistance was defined by resistance to either ceftriaxone or ceftazidime using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints, while combined cefoxitin resistance with ceftriaxone or ceftazidime resistance was used to detect AmpCs (as per European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing standards).
Results
Overall, there were 170 isolates. Genotypically, 21 (12.4%) had AmpC and 18 (10.6%) had ESBL genes detected. Phenotypically, 11 (6.5%) isolates were AmpC and 26 (15.3%) were ESBL producing organisms. Genotypic testing identified an additional 14 AmpC and two ESBL isolates that failed to meet phenotypic criteria.
Conclusions
Using combined genotypic and phenotypic methods to detect AmpC and ESBL producing organisms increased the identification of resistant organism and provided potentially clinical relevant data to guide the treatment of resistant organisms.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.