European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich fibrin combined with diced cartilage in rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
M Alharbi Salmah, H Alotaibi Ghaida, A Alshehri Ali, J Asiry Ali, S Alahmari Mohammed
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) with diced cartilage (DC) in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted, including studies published through August 9, 2024. We included observational studies and clinical trials of rhinoplasty using the DC technique with PRF. Primary outcomes were cartilage resorption, nasal dorsum/tip irregularity, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications such as edema, hematoma, infection, erythema, displacement, and extrusion. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the ROB2 tool for randomized trials and the MINORS checklist for observational studies.
RESULTS: Seven studies with 286 participants were included. Results showed minimal cartilage resorption in five studies. The pooled incidences of nasal dorsum/tip irregularity, erythema, and displacement were 0.43% [95% CI: 0.00-1.95%], 1.63% [95% CI: 0.00-4.99%], and 0.63% [95% CI: 0.00-2.22%], respectively. Patient satisfaction was high, with a pooled rate of 94.33% [95% CI: 89.28-99.38%].
CONCLUSION: The addition of PRF to DC in rhinoplasty was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes and high patient satisfaction, with a low incidence of complications. However, the lack of comparative studies makes it difficult to determine whether PRF provides significant benefits over DC alone. Larger randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to further validate these findings.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted, including studies published through August 9, 2024. We included observational studies and clinical trials of rhinoplasty using the DC technique with PRF. Primary outcomes were cartilage resorption, nasal dorsum/tip irregularity, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications such as edema, hematoma, infection, erythema, displacement, and extrusion. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the ROB2 tool for randomized trials and the MINORS checklist for observational studies.
RESULTS: Seven studies with 286 participants were included. Results showed minimal cartilage resorption in five studies. The pooled incidences of nasal dorsum/tip irregularity, erythema, and displacement were 0.43% [95% CI: 0.00-1.95%], 1.63% [95% CI: 0.00-4.99%], and 0.63% [95% CI: 0.00-2.22%], respectively. Patient satisfaction was high, with a pooled rate of 94.33% [95% CI: 89.28-99.38%].
CONCLUSION: The addition of PRF to DC in rhinoplasty was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes and high patient satisfaction, with a low incidence of complications. However, the lack of comparative studies makes it difficult to determine whether PRF provides significant benefits over DC alone. Larger randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to further validate these findings.