International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2024
Outcome of regenerative endodontic procedures in delayed replanted immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: A retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sheng Kai, Ding Ning, Zhao Shi-Min, Chen Hui, Lai Guang-Yun, Wang Jun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) is effective for treating young permanent teeth with pulp necrosis. However, its efficacy on delayed replanted avulsed teeth is unclear.
AIM: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of REPs in treating delayed replanted immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis.
DESIGN: Avulsed teeth receiving REPs were systematically screened based on predetermined criteria. This study assessed the REP outcomes, postoperative periodontal healing, and overall treatment efficacy. Samples were grouped by REP outcomes and root development stage, with Fisher's exact tests used to compare outcomes among different groups.
RESULTS: Among the included 17 teeth, 47.1% exhibited successful REPs and periodontal healing. Another 47.1%, due to replacement resorption or REP failure, were categorized as tooth survival. Healing of periapical lesions was observed in 88.2% of the cases, but only 41.2% demonstrated continued root development. Although differences were not significant (p = 0.05), teeth with continued root development had a higher rate of functional healing (85.7%) compared to those without (30%).
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, REPs presented reliable outcomes for treating delayed replanted immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis mainly in periapical lesion healing. Teeth with continued root development after REPs exhibited a higher rate of functional healing. Further investigation is required to explore potential synergies between REP outcomes and periodontal healing.
AIM: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of REPs in treating delayed replanted immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis.
DESIGN: Avulsed teeth receiving REPs were systematically screened based on predetermined criteria. This study assessed the REP outcomes, postoperative periodontal healing, and overall treatment efficacy. Samples were grouped by REP outcomes and root development stage, with Fisher's exact tests used to compare outcomes among different groups.
RESULTS: Among the included 17 teeth, 47.1% exhibited successful REPs and periodontal healing. Another 47.1%, due to replacement resorption or REP failure, were categorized as tooth survival. Healing of periapical lesions was observed in 88.2% of the cases, but only 41.2% demonstrated continued root development. Although differences were not significant (p = 0.05), teeth with continued root development had a higher rate of functional healing (85.7%) compared to those without (30%).
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, REPs presented reliable outcomes for treating delayed replanted immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis mainly in periapical lesion healing. Teeth with continued root development after REPs exhibited a higher rate of functional healing. Further investigation is required to explore potential synergies between REP outcomes and periodontal healing.