The Journal of international medical research · 2023
Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine-based regimens for primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xiaojing, Zhu Wenwei, Bao Jizhang, Li Jiekai, Zhou Yongming
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis assessing the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine-based combinations for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).
METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trials were collected by systematically searching databases (PubMed®, MEDLINE®, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to June 2022. All studies included patients with ITP who received cyclosporine-based regimens. We performed comprehensive analyses of the overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, relapse rate, platelet count, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) rate.
RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 418) were ultimately included. According to a fixed-effects model, cyclosporine-based combinations improved the ORR and CR rate and reduced the relapse rate. The ADR rate was not increased in the cyclosporine-based combination group. Cyclosporine-based regimens effectively increased the platelet count. Subgroup analysis illustrated that cyclosporine-based combinations were linked to higher ORRs in both children (odds ratio [OR] = 5.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.79-18.41) and adults (OR = 5.46, 95% CI = 2.48-12.02) and a higher CR rate in adults (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.56-5.63).
CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine exhibited efficacy in the treatment of ITP without increasing the risk of ADRs.
METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trials were collected by systematically searching databases (PubMed®, MEDLINE®, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to June 2022. All studies included patients with ITP who received cyclosporine-based regimens. We performed comprehensive analyses of the overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, relapse rate, platelet count, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) rate.
RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 418) were ultimately included. According to a fixed-effects model, cyclosporine-based combinations improved the ORR and CR rate and reduced the relapse rate. The ADR rate was not increased in the cyclosporine-based combination group. Cyclosporine-based regimens effectively increased the platelet count. Subgroup analysis illustrated that cyclosporine-based combinations were linked to higher ORRs in both children (odds ratio [OR] = 5.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.79-18.41) and adults (OR = 5.46, 95% CI = 2.48-12.02) and a higher CR rate in adults (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.56-5.63).
CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine exhibited efficacy in the treatment of ITP without increasing the risk of ADRs.