The Journal of pediatrics · 2023
Novel Approach to Improve the Identification of the Bleeding Phenotype in Noonan Syndrome and Related RASopathies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bruno Leah, Lenberg Jerica, Le Dzung, Dimmock David, Thornburg Courtney D, Briggs Benjamin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the bleeding phenotype in Noonan syndrome (NS), to test the utility of following national guidelines in detecting this phenotype, to evaluate thromboelastography (TEG) as a diagnostic tool, and to evaluate the cohort for genotype-phenotype correlations.
STUDY DESIGN: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of NS or related RASopathies were enrolled in a cohort study. Study procedures included clinical bleeding assessment, coagulation testing per guidelines, and hematology consultation. TEG was completed in a subset, and genetic testing was conducted for those without a molecular diagnosis. International Society of Haemostasis and Thrombosis Bleeding Assessment Tool scores were calculated with hematology consultation. Bleeding phenotype was defined as abnormal bleeding score.
RESULTS: Twenty participants were enrolled; 12 completed clinical and laboratory evaluation, and five of whom met the definition for bleeding phenotype. Four of the five participants with a bleeding phenotype had platelet aggregation defects and at least one additional coagulation defect. TEG was performed in nine participants, four with bleeding phenotype and five without, and results were normal in all cases. No genotype-phenotype correlation was found.
CONCLUSION: Five of the 20 participants had a bleeding phenotype identified. Based on available data, we do not recommend incorporating TEG into clinical practice for patients with NS. Platelet aggregation defects were the most common abnormalities, which would not be detected on tier 1 testing of current guidelines; therefore, we propose a new algorithm.
STUDY DESIGN: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of NS or related RASopathies were enrolled in a cohort study. Study procedures included clinical bleeding assessment, coagulation testing per guidelines, and hematology consultation. TEG was completed in a subset, and genetic testing was conducted for those without a molecular diagnosis. International Society of Haemostasis and Thrombosis Bleeding Assessment Tool scores were calculated with hematology consultation. Bleeding phenotype was defined as abnormal bleeding score.
RESULTS: Twenty participants were enrolled; 12 completed clinical and laboratory evaluation, and five of whom met the definition for bleeding phenotype. Four of the five participants with a bleeding phenotype had platelet aggregation defects and at least one additional coagulation defect. TEG was performed in nine participants, four with bleeding phenotype and five without, and results were normal in all cases. No genotype-phenotype correlation was found.
CONCLUSION: Five of the 20 participants had a bleeding phenotype identified. Based on available data, we do not recommend incorporating TEG into clinical practice for patients with NS. Platelet aggregation defects were the most common abnormalities, which would not be detected on tier 1 testing of current guidelines; therefore, we propose a new algorithm.