Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
Assessment of the in vitro activity of azithromycin niosomes alone and in combination with levofloxacin on extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Owais Hoda Mohamed, Baddour Manal Mohammad, El-Metwally Hala Abd El-Raouf, Barakat Heba Soliman, Ammar Nour Sherif, Meheissen Marwa Ahmed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae represent a major threat in intensive care units. The aim of the current study was to formulate a niosomal form of azithromycin (AZM) and to evaluate its in vitro effect on XDR K. pneumoniae as a single agent or in combination with levofloxacin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty XDR K. pneumoniae isolates (23 colistin-sensitive and 17 colistin-resistant) were included in the study. Formulation and characterization of AZM niosomes were performed. The in vitro effect of AZM solution/niosomes alone and in combination (with levofloxacin) was investigated using the checkerboard assay, confirmed with time-kill assay and post-antibiotic effect (PAE).
RESULTS: The AZM niosome mean minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (187.4 ± 209.1 μg/mL) was significantly lower than that of the AZM solution (342.5 ± 343.4 μg/mL). AZM niosomes/levofloxacin revealed a 40% synergistic effect compared to 20% with AZM solution/levofloxacin. No antagonistic effect was detected. The mean MIC values of both AZM niosomes and AZM solution were lower in the colistin-resistant group than in the colistin-sensitive group. The mean PAE time of AZM niosomes (2.3 ± 1.09 h) was statistically significantly longer than that of the AZM solution (1.37 ± 0.5 h) (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: AZM niosomes were proved to be more effective than AZM solution against XDR K. pneumoniae, even colistin-resistant isolates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty XDR K. pneumoniae isolates (23 colistin-sensitive and 17 colistin-resistant) were included in the study. Formulation and characterization of AZM niosomes were performed. The in vitro effect of AZM solution/niosomes alone and in combination (with levofloxacin) was investigated using the checkerboard assay, confirmed with time-kill assay and post-antibiotic effect (PAE).
RESULTS: The AZM niosome mean minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (187.4 ± 209.1 μg/mL) was significantly lower than that of the AZM solution (342.5 ± 343.4 μg/mL). AZM niosomes/levofloxacin revealed a 40% synergistic effect compared to 20% with AZM solution/levofloxacin. No antagonistic effect was detected. The mean MIC values of both AZM niosomes and AZM solution were lower in the colistin-resistant group than in the colistin-sensitive group. The mean PAE time of AZM niosomes (2.3 ± 1.09 h) was statistically significantly longer than that of the AZM solution (1.37 ± 0.5 h) (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: AZM niosomes were proved to be more effective than AZM solution against XDR K. pneumoniae, even colistin-resistant isolates.