MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02724385

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of pediatrics · 2002

Clinico-pathological profile of pediatric lymphadenopathy.

Reddy M Pradeep, Moorchung Nekhil, Chaudhary Arun

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinico-pathological profile of significant pediatric peripheral lymphadenopathy and to arrrive at an etiological diagnosis.

METHODS

Prospective study in a tertiary care hospital setting. One hundred consecutive children reporting to pediatric OPD from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1998, aged 1 month to 12 years were studied.

RESULTS

The commonest aetiology diagnosed was tubercular lymphadenitis in 35% cases, followed by chronic tonsillopharyngitis in 15% cases. Lymphomas, AIDS and infectious mononucleosis constituted 3, 2 and 1 cases each. Aetiology could not be ascertained in 44 (44%) children even after detailed haematological, microbiological, radiological and serological investigations. FNAC's sensitivity and specificity as compared to 'gold standard of excision lymph node biopsy was 94% and 100% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tubercular lymphadenitis was the commonest treatable entity of significant pediatric peripheral lymphadenopathy. A majority of the cases even after thorough evaluation, remained undiagnosed. FNAC as a diagnostic modality is almost as sensitive and as specific as excision lymph node biopsy when an adequate aspirate is examined by expert eyes.

Для цитирования: Reddy M Pradeep, Moorchung Nekhil, Chaudhary Arun. Clinico-pathological profile of pediatric lymphadenopathy.. Indian journal of pediatrics. 2002. DOI: 10.1007/bf02724385.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.